Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (SAP ASE) for Custom Applications
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3587

Re: changed behaviour of textptr sp122, sp134/sp135

$
0
0

Hi

 

Thanks for this - it might help us with another issue we've been having with performance of text fields.

 

I don't have access to anything less than SP134 so would appreciate if you can see if the space usage changes between the 2 versions.

 

When I run sp_spaceused on one of my tables where ALL the text fields are null it shows huge space usage.

 

name        rowtotal  reserved          data           index_size       unused

Messages 56099    1048752 KB     7856 KB    1024128 KB     16560 KB

 

If I create the same table but use a varchar instead of a text field I get

 

name        rowtotal  reserved          data           index_size       unused

Messages 56099    6144 KB           4704 KB     864 KB            528 KB


It looks like the text field has 16k pre-allocate to it (Our server is set to 16k pages).


Could you see what the difference in spaceused is for your tables on SP< 134 and SP134.


(Have you reported it as an incident ?)


Thanks


Mike



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3587

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>